Site overview
48.864°N, 2.346°E

Site analysis of 1st Arrondissement, Paris

Full CAD data and land survey

Site Metrics

0.62
Area (km²)
9,782
Buildings
15810
Buildings / km²
569.6%
Built Footprint
360
Avg Footprint (m²)
14.24
Est. FAR Index
24%
Green Coverage

Feature Breakdown

Buildings
9,782
Roads & Paths
13,262
Green Areas
607
Water Bodies
50
Trees
6,806
Site map

Program Breakdown

Residential
5,887
Commercial
171
Office
118
Industrial
11
Civic & Public
120
Religious
67
Unspecified
3,408
Program breakdown map

Site Potential

Site Potential Index
0 / 100

Dense context demands careful optimization

Density & Intensification

Density Level
High
Intensification Headroom
Limited

The existing urban fabric is already quite dense, which suggests that new development should focus on infill or selective replacement strategies. Consider building typologies that maximize efficiency within constrained footprints. Vertical additions to existing structures may offer viable paths forward.

Buildability & Massing

Massing Flexibility
Balanced
Block Scale
Mid-scale

The balanced urban context supports standard massing approaches while requiring selective adaptation at key interfaces. Modest adjustments to setbacks or building heights may be needed at property boundaries. Overall, conventional typologies should perform well with minor site-specific refinements.

Programmatic Signals

Housing Suitability
Medium
Office / Mixed-Use
Medium
Retail Potential
Strong

The balanced metrics suggest this site can flexibly accommodate mixed-use programming, blending residential, commercial, and retail functions. Hybrid typologies with distinct vertical zoning could optimize value across different uses. Consider market demand studies to fine-tune the programmatic split.

Open Space & Landscape

Open Space Potential
Low
Landscape Integration
Possible

Limited ground-level open space shifts landscape opportunities to vertical surfaces and rooftops, where green facades, terraces, and intensive roof gardens can provide ecological and amenity value. Consider investing in high-quality hardscape design for the constrained outdoor areas. Pocket parks or courtyards become precious assets requiring careful programming.

Urban Character

Character
Compact Urban
Design Posture
Careful Infill

The compact urban character calls for a careful infill approach that respects established street walls, building heights, and material palettes. New architecture should engage in dialogue with its neighbors rather than asserting isolated identity. Contextual sensitivity will likely be valued by planning authorities and the community.

Balance Sheet

Opportunities
  • +Compact urban fabric supports active ground floors
  • +Existing green infrastructure offers integration opportunities
  • +Larger footprints enable efficient floor plate design
Constraints
  • −High built footprint limits ground-level open space
  • −Dense surroundings suggest careful daylight strategy
  • −High existing FAR may limit additional vertical development

Find a site, get a report

Liked this report? Generate your own detailed site analysis for any location worldwide — instantly and for free.

Open the App

More site reports

Browse all →

Report ID: e2l80y

Browse the full index of every site report